Gina Rinehart’s Murray-Darling Fitzroy Threat

Water Grab Proposed for the Fitzroy

Urge the WA Ministers responsible for the Fitzroy's future not to sell the river out to Gina Rinehart’s Murray-Darling plans!

I want to write my own message

Send a prefilled message

Dear Minister Wyatt, Minister MacTiernan, Minister Kelly and Minister Dawson,

Yours faithfully,
[Your name will be added automatically]

I write to urge you to reject Gina Rinehart’s offer to trade off parts of her Fitzroy Valley pastoral lease for a massive water entitlement. The proposed water license of 325 GL would turn Gina Rinehart’s iconic pastoral stations into one of the biggest irrigation properties in the Southern Hemisphere: close to the largest at Cubbie Station in the Murray-Darling Basin that uses an annual average of 200 GL. Mrs Rinehart’s proposal would put the Fitzroy River on a pathway towards the fish kills and irretrievable damage we see on the Murray-Darling rivers. The National Heritage listed free flows of the Fitzroy are too important to be bargained away.
Her offer to trade areas of her pastoral lease for water does not stack up. The land is not hers to trade. It is owned by the State and therefore people of Western Australia, and the Native Title holders. Mrs Rinehart only owns the pastoral lease over the land.
The creation of the proposed Fitzroy River National Park is strongly supported; however, this must not come at the expense of protecting the National Heritage listed natural flows of the Fitzroy River and its floodplains. Creating water storage dams on these floodplains would hold back river flows in the wet season, and should violate the ‘no-dams’ policy.
The river is considered the last stronghold of the critically endangered freshwater sawfish. Damaging the natural flows of the Fitzroy River will put the sawfish one step closer to extinction.  Taking water from the river will also have serious economic costs. In particular, Aboriginal people who get nearly a quarter of their food from fish and plants around the river would lose food supplies as river productivity is reduced. Also, land clearing for crops and dams along the Fitzroy River would release thousands of tonnes of carbon. The prospects for sustainable industries like tourism will be damaged. 
At the 2017 election, you promised to protect the Fitzroy River and support sustainable development. Gina Rinehart’s plans are not sustainable and will not protect the river. I urge you to reject this proposal and instead protect the Fitzroy River and floodplains from dams and water extraction.

Read the message you will send

Dear Minister Wyatt, Minister MacTiernan, Minister Kelly and Minister Dawson,

I write to urge you to reject Gina Rinehart’s offer to trade off parts of her Fitzroy Valley pastoral lease for a massive water entitlement.

The proposed water license of 325 GL would turn Gina Rinehart’s iconic pastoral stations into one of the biggest irrigation properties in the Southern Hemisphere: close to the largest at Cubbie Station in the Murray-Darling Basin that uses an annual average of 200 GL. Mrs Rinehart’s proposal would put the Fitzroy River on a pathway towards the fish kills and irretrievable damage we see on the Murray-Darling rivers. The National Heritage listed free flows of the Fitzroy are too important to be bargained away.

Her offer to trade areas of her pastoral lease for water does not stack up. The land is not hers to trade. It is owned by the State and therefore people of Western Australia, and the Native Title holders. Mrs Rinehart only owns the pastoral lease over the land.

The creation of the proposed Fitzroy River National Park is strongly supported; however, this must not come at the expense of protecting the National Heritage listed natural flows of the Fitzroy River and its floodplains. Creating water storage dams on these floodplains would hold back river flows in the wet season, and should violate the ‘no-dams’ policy.

The river is considered the last stronghold of the critically endangered freshwater sawfish. Damaging the natural flows of the Fitzroy River will put the sawfish one step closer to extinction.

Taking water from the river will also have serious economic costs. In particular, Aboriginal people who get nearly a quarter of their food from fish and plants around the river would lose food supplies as river productivity is reduced. Also, land clearing for crops and dams along the Fitzroy River would release thousands of tonnes of carbon. The prospects for sustainable industries like tourism will be damaged.

At the 2017 election, you promised to protect the Fitzroy River and support sustainable development. Gina Rinehart’s plans are not sustainable and will not protect the river. I urge you to reject this proposal and instead protect the Fitzroy River and floodplains from dams and water extraction.

Yours faithfully,
[Your name will be automatically added]

We will only use your details to send this email and to forward you other campaign-related material. Your details will not be passed on to any third party entities.

TIPS FOR YOUR MESSAGE:

I write to urge you to reject Gina Rinehart’s offer to trade off parts of her Fitzroy Valley pastoral lease for a massive water entitlement.
The requested water license of 325 GL would turn Rinehart’s pastoral stations into one of the biggest irrigation properties in the Southern Hemisphere: close to the largest at Cubbie Station cotton farm in the Murray-Darling that uses an average of 200 GL of water per year.
The offer to trade areas of Gina Rinehart's pastoral lease for water does not stack up. The land is not hers to trade. It is owned by the State and therefore people of Western Australia, and the native title holders. Mrs Rinehart only owns the pastoral lease over the land.
The Fitzroy River is part of our National Heritage. It is the last stronghold of the critically endangered freshwater sawfish that would be put at risk of extinction by taking flood waters from the Fitzroy River.
Taking water will also have devastating economic costs. In particular, Aboriginal people who get nearly a quarter of their food from fish and plants around the river would lose food supplies. Land clearing for crops and dams along the Fitzroy River would release thousands of tonnes of carbon.
At the 2017 election, you promised to protect the Fitzroy River and support sustainable development. Gina Rinehart’s plans are not sustainable and will not protect the river. I urge you to reject this proposal and instead protect the Fitzroy River and floodplains from dams and water extraction.